Songwriting - Balancing Innovation with Predictability

June 17th, 2009
Gary Ewer asked:


Everyone’s looking for innovation when it comes to writing songs. Obviously, you don’t want your songs to just sound like every other song out there. You want yours to stand out. Making a song stand out from the rest requires innovation - a new approach. But here’s the danger: if your songs are too innovative, you’ll find that listeners can get confused, or even bored. Songs need to have something predictable about them. In other words, if your song is too innovative, it can drive your audience away.

Gary Ewer is a veteran music teacher, clinician, composer and arranger. He is most well known as the author of The Essential Secrets of Songwriting and Gary Ewer’s Easy Music Theory

Innovation is not a bad thing, and many great bands and singers have spent years building up an audience for their material by being innovative. But for the most innovative performers out there, the building of that audience will require a long time, and lots of patience.

This article is for those of you who want to build audiences quickly. It’s one thing to be satisfied with taking years to build a listenership. But I know that many of you are wanting to get a loyal following sooner than that. You can do that by concentrating more on predictability at first rather than innovation.

So if you want to build an audience for your music quickly, you’ll need to think about presenting your material in a fresh, innovative way that does not abandon tradition. The Beatles are probably the greatest example of this. Their early music was modeled after some very successful singers: Buddy Holly, Elvis Presley, Chuck Berry and others. Presented in a fresh way, their early music relied on standard song forms, with rather traditional chord changes and melodic structures. “All My Lovin’”, “I Want to Hold Your Hand,” “She Loves You,” etc. Great songs, strongly steeped in tradition, with a hint of innovation.

Once the Beatles got that audience, they began to experiment more with innovative compositional and recording techniques. So having built up a loyal audience, they were able to present songs like “I Am the Walrus,” “Strawberry Fields Forever,” and so on. And that loyal audience, generally speaking, hung in there with them.

So here are some tips to consider for balancing innovation with tradition:

1) Be sure that at least one element of your songs - either chord progressions, melody, lyric or basic form, is traditional, and somewhat predictable. This will help those looking for something “safe”, and will give you a solid basis to present something innovative.

2) For the element of your song that you might consider innovative, remember that the “further out there” it is, the stronger the possibility that you will scare away listeners. This is not necessarily a bad thing, because you may pick up listeners that you wouldn’t have otherwise had. Just remember that the more innovation you use, the slower you’ll build that audience.

3) Don’t be afraid to clothe complex lyrics or melody with a traditional ABABCB type of form. Simple forms are great ways to make sure that a listener doesn’t feel lost.

And always remember to be yourself. Being innovative simply because you want to try to sound different will not succeed. You need to always be presenting your material in a way that is true to the musician inside you. Being weird for weird’s sake will come across as pretentious.



Using Expert-Based Research to Enable Innovation

June 7th, 2009
Brian Reuter asked:


In today’s environment of economic hardship and intense competition, almost every CEO in America realizes the importance of increasing their organization’s ability to innovate. In fact a recent PricewaterhouseCoopers study revealed that CEOs ranked product development second in importance only to innovation as a source of competitive advantage. Former GE executive and author Jack Welch offers this perspective, “…if the rate of change inside the institution is less than the rate of change outside, the end is in sight. The only question is the timing of the end.” The challenge to innovate is great, yet most companies struggle through a disjointed process, often stuck in their traditional way of looking at their business.

Research shows that it takes nearly 300 ideas to achieve a single successful product. “Forward-thinking firms are moving aggressively to make the right choices to improve innovation and product development,” said Ken Amann, Director of Research at consulting and research firm CIMdata. These firms have strategically focused on innovation as an organizational core competency and reinforce this philosophy by (1) focusing the organization on innovation (2) enabling innovation through a continuous injection of new, divergent perspectives (3) converging on the high-value ideas through an objective evaluation process.

How Do They Do It?

Leading innovators know that they can increase the business impact of innovation by injecting an external perspective during idea generation and evaluation. By leveraging the technical knowledge of experts and the evolving needs of lead users they narrow the list of ideas to the prioritized few with the greatest commercial promise.

For more than 20 years, Guideline has helped leading companies enable innovation and converge on the right ideas by providing assistance in organizing and moderating expert forums. The magic occurs within these interactions as the ideas and perspectives of an expert or experts fuse with the knowledge of individuals on the client team. Their combined insight fuels innovation, generating new ideas or improving the feasibility of concepts in play. Let’s look at a few examples that demonstrate how leading innovators have leveraged external insight and expertise to generate, evaluate and prioritize ideas.

Product-Concept Ideation

Need to invigorate a stale ideation process?

Technical experts and leading technology users can be gathered in a forum to discuss unmet needs, limitations of existing solutions, product concepts, and unique product needs. Bringing fresh minds from outside an organization together, in a moderated session, will invariably produce new, solid product concepts. Guideline recently organized and moderated an expert forum for a leading medical products company. The session produced 10 specific new product concepts and in turn fueled additional ideas within the client observer group, generating a total of 40 product concepts.

Product-Concept Testing

Do you have numerous ideas but need an unbiased opinion to help prioritize the list?

A forum of industry experts provides a direct, open platform for gaining objective, independent insight on product-development concepts. Their viewpoint can help you clarify and prioritize ideas with the greatest potential. You can couple this input with in-depth telephone interviews with additional experts and/or leading users. The results will help you uncover barriers to adoption, ability to meet unmet needs, pros/cons of specific product features, and purchaser acceptance. Another of Guideline’s medical products clients used this method to filter and prioritize 10 new product concepts. The experts helped them select the three most commercially promising concepts which subsequently received approval and funding for further development.

Product Concept Risk Analysis

You’ve got the idea and tested the concept, how do you evaluate the external risks associated with developing the product concept?

Engage an industry expert to interact with you and your project team to discuss the specific aspects of the product concept. Moderated interactions can be open or anonymous and are conducted either on-site or via teleconference. Open interactions allow both the expert and the client to be known to each other. Anonymous interactions allow the client to remain anonymous while deriving specific information from the expert(s) for product development. On-site interactions bring the expert(s) to a location for face-to-face meetings, typically for a minimum of half to full day interaction. This provides for more complete interaction between participants. Teleconference meetings are used for shorter interactions.

In a recent interaction, a leading technology-driven consumer packaged goods company hosted a teleconference with an industry expert, moderated by Guidleline. While remaining anonymous, the client team discussed the risks involved in the regulatory approval process for their product concept. The expert’s knowledge of the industry and regulatory-process issues provided the team with alternative perspectives which helped them make a better go/no-go decision based on more realistic estimates of development and approval costs for their product concept.

Best Practices in Service Delivery

What are the key services you must offer along with your new product to be competitive in the market?

A forum of industry experts can be used to assist you in examining critical success factors, such as product qualification, market demands, customer acceptance, and quality system requirements.

Guideline recently moderated an on-site forum of recognized industry experts to determine supply chain management best practices for the high-volume, high-quality, cost-conscious global semiconductor market. The outcome of this expert panel identified and ranked the importance of industry-specific issues, e.g., quality programs such as ISO, TQM, Six Sigma, SPC, FMEA, and correction & control. This allowed the client to focus on the most critical service dimensions for their industry.

As you can see, using external technical and industry experts can provide valuable insights to inspire innovation that leads to winning products and services.



Marketing Innovative Products

June 3rd, 2009
Brad Barrett asked:


Innovative products need to be marketed and sold differently than other offerings since they require a special customer who is receptive to innovation. Most customers are skeptical and will wait until innovative products are mass marketed.

Here are a few suggestions on how to market innovative products:

• Not everyone will understand the need for the innovation. They will need to be educated about the problem. Think of it from their perspective-why should they care? Help them understand the problem that needs to be solved and how your product addresses that problem.

• Explain how your product is different. People buy things because of the differences not because it is the same. If your

offering is truly innovative, this won’t be a problem.

• Be authentic. Customers are drawn to sellers who believe in the offerings. Your enthusiasm will be contagious and appealing. If you fake it, they will see right through you.

• Position your product as a high-quality alternative. Innovation and quality make great companion benefits. Take the high road.

• Consider the impact of premium pricing. People are aware that innovative solutions cost more. Price the offering based on value.

Innovative products need a customer who appreciates the value of the new product. Don’t waste your time on the late adopters or laggards-they will only buy when they have no other alternative.

Instead look for the innovative buyer or early adopter. Truly innovative buyers leave tracks. They buy other innovative products and visit leading edge websites. The good news is that they will seek you out since they are always on the hunt for the next new thing-so make a lot of noise so that they can find you.

John Bradley Jackson

© Copyright 2008 All rights reserved.



Organizing for Innovation

May 25th, 2009
Jose Allan Tan asked:


Cool factor is high on the list when it comes to perception of innovation. Companies like Apple Computer get high marks for cool factor and have come to be perceived as the cradle of innovation within the computing industry.

Creative designers and engineers dream of developing the coolest new device or solving the most challenging problem in a novel way. Executives and shareholders have grand dreams as well but the realities of business require them to keep an eye on growth, profitability and the creation of corporate value.

In a survey of 125 global companies, Aberdeen found that 82 percent emphasize on growing product revenue and 93 percent on reducing cost. Manufacturers are faced with customers who want products that are innovative and rank high on the “cool factor” scale, but also have a shorter product lifecycle; and lower cost to produce. At the same time, globalization has meant competitors can come from anywhere in the world; and global sourcing means increased design and supply chain complexity. To cap it off, manufacturers are being asked to comply with varying regularity requirements at the countries they do business with.

The challenges to product innovation vary greatly by industry and geography (see Figure 1). Multiple factors are at play in the increased complexity and competition in product innovation. Unfortunately, there is no “one size fits all” solution. The innovation mandate is to produce more competitive products that better meet customer needs in a shorter period of time. And companies have to accomplish this while maintaining or even lowering product cost. The ability to adapt to these new market conditions effectively will determine the long-term winners and losers in manufacturing.

Cost pressure has intensified. Industry consolidation has resulted in a smaller number of larger, more powerful companies in many markets. These companies frequently dictate price reduction on their suppliers and supply chain.

Product lifecycles have shrunk. Knowledgeable customers are demanding innovation, and punishing commodity products with lower demand and profit margins. The result is that product profitability windows have shrunk.

Competition is tougher. Lower trade barriers and broader market reach due to advances in communications have opened up competition. Challenging market conditions have forced companies to improve in order to compete.

Markets and supply chains are globalizing. Many companies are competing in new markets and leveraging low-cost manufacturing from other countries. Companies operate in global manufacturing networks. We also see a shift to global design networks. Products must be designed with multiple markets in mind, complicating requirements and burdening designs with additional regulatory and commercial constraints.

Product complexity has increased. Products are becoming more complex to match customer needs more closely.

According to Jim Brown, Vice President and Service Director, Global Product Innovation and Engineering at Aberdeen “companies are succeeding in enhancing top-level business metrics by improving performance in product innovation, product development and engineering.” Manufacturers surveyed reported double-digit improvements in product revenue (19 percent), decreased product costs (15 percent), and reduced product development cost (16 percent) by improving product innovation processes.

Today’s leading enterprises are finding new ways to generate innovative product ideas, translate these concepts into compelling products quickly and efficiently, get these products to market quickly, and leverage these for optimal results.

Automating for Product Innovation Success

The increased globalization of markets and networked model of design and manufacturing resources demand strong communication and collaboration capabilities. Contributors in engineering and other disciplines will need tools to help them develop and test designs that were previously unachievable in practical terms with manual methods.

To improve product innovation, product development, and engineering processes, companies need enabling technologies such as product lifecycle management (PLM) solutions. PLM is a strategic business approach that applies a consistent set of business solutions in support of the collaborative creation, management, dissemination, and use of product definition information across the extended enterprise from product concept to end of life. It integrates people, processes, business systems, and information to create an environment in which companies can improve the efficiency of their product development programs.

Companies that have adopted PLM have realized savings in areas such as engineering, product development, time to market, and improved product quality.

CASE STUDY - Jinbei Automotive

Shengyang Brilliance Jinbei Automobile has grand ambitions – to become an internationally recognized automaker within five to ten years. Location in Shenyang, China, Jinbei manufactures light passenger vehicles. Originally designed for the domestic market, Jinbei has set its sight on the global market with expansions into new markets.

To achieve its goal, Jinbei management identified several areas for improvement. To bring new vehicles to market faster and reduce cost, Jinbei needed to streamline the research and development (R&D) process. Jinbei executives wanted better access to product knowledge to improve the quality of their strategic decisions for greater product innovation. Early in the process, the company discovered that it did not have a common platform for product information. Each vehicle model had a program that was independent of the others. Information re-use was non-existing. Lack of part sharing extended the development cycle and increased cost. The paper-based design review process and lack of a formal system for capturing knowledge further contributed to what was perceived as areas of inefficiencies.

Jinbei management realized it needed a PLM strategy to support its long-term development plan. “We needed a leading-edge information system that was not only powerful but also flexible enough to integrate with executive-level information, thereby helping us make better decisions in a highly competitive market environment,” says He Tao, President of Shenyang Brilliance Jinbei Automobile.

After evaluating different solutions, Jinbei chose Teamcenter from UGS. Teamcenter offered a comprehensive system for product and process management by capturing, sharing and leveraging product knowledge. This allowed Jinbei to reduce repetitive work, enforce standard practices, and enhance efficiency. Teamcenter supports collaboration and teamwork by connecting people with processes. Its visualization capabilities made product information accessible electronically throughout Jinbei. And because digital product models are more easily understood than drawings, visualization helped leverage product information beyond the product development group.

Teamcenter gives Jinbei management immediate access to critical information such as digital product models (originally authored in Catia, then translated to CAD-neutral JT files in Teamcenter), all product-related documents, including bills of material, engineering change orders, cost data, and quality documents, and the status of workflows.

During the three-month pilot project, a centralized management of product information combined with ease of information access reduced basic design time by 20 percent. This led to a reduction in cost for the pilot project by 5 percent. Parts and information re-use increased by 7 percent, contributing to another 2 percent reduction in costs.

Based on the results of the pilot program, Jinbei expects Teamcenter to reduce R&D time by an average of 10 percent. Programs that involve less than the design of an entire vehicle will achieve even greater reduction in R&D process.

Jinbei’s successful three-month pilot program convinced management to extend the benefits of Teamcenter companywide. Already the company plans to involve suppliers and partners in the electronic collaboration, capturing knowledge and creating a company-wide knowledge base by implementing additional Teamcenter functionalities.

By reaping the benefits of Teamcenter, Jinbei management believes they are on their way to achieving their goal of international recognition.

Call to Action

There are many options available to achieve innovation and improve product profitability within the enterprise.

Evaluate your product innovation goals in business terms not just operational metrics. Tie the value back to business as a whole.

Identify and implement operational improvements that yield tangible business results. Focus efforts on high-value initiatives that create a foundation for future improvements.

Manage for innovation success. Assign responsibility to a senior executive (with authority) for end-to-end innovation success, standardize processes, and measure performance frequently on a global basis.

Approach product innovation as a “team sport.” Look for ways to share knowledge, information and workflow within and outside the enterprise, including with global design networks.

Intelligently implement PLM technologies to reach revenue growth and product cost reduction targets.

Don’t try to implement PLM processes and technologies all at once. Pick and choose a path to the right value for your business, and then continue to build on that foundation.



Business Model Innovation

May 21st, 2009
Greg O’Connor asked:


What is business model innovation (BMI)?

 

BMI is about finding new ways to add value to a business in the face of rapidly changing circumstances - economic, social, environmental, technological and political, global, national and local. People have been devising innovative ways to do business for centuries. The explosion in the breadth, scope and power of communications and other technologies over the past decade, however, and in particular the emergence of the commercial Internet, has opened new business model possibilities which were previously unimaginable. This is so regardless of the nature of the core business.

 

BMI requires of business owners and managers not just a thorough understanding of the key players in their particular industry, but also a sophisticated appreciation of the likely impacts of emerging global, national and local trends and events. It is no longer enough to simply be aware of what the competition is doing. This is an outdated, reactive approach which completely misses the point that the global business environment is changing in ways, and at a pace, never before seen. It is businesses which properly understand this point which will be able to position themselves to take advantage of the most profitable opportunities these trends and events open up, and to avoid their most adverse consequences.

 

Why BMI is important

 

BMI is crucial not just for the sake of maintaining current profitability, but also because the valuation of an operating business is significantly affected by the level of future maintainable earnings. Because of this, any business owner with a future sale in mind must recognise that maintaining business model relevance in the face of rapidly changing circumstances is as crucial to future sale value as it is to current profitability.

 

BMI - the current view

 

In a recent edition of Fast Thinking magazine (link here), the leader of Strategy and Change Consulting with IBM Global Business Services, Matt English, observed as follows:

 

… IBM’s Global CEO Study 2006, which surveyed over 750 CEOs worldwide, concluded that business model innovation is the key differentiator in an increasingly competitive and globalised market place. …

 

The study had examined three types of innovation which CEOs had identified as being crucial in driving growth in their organisations - products and services innovation, operational innovation and business model innovation. The study demonstrated that organisations with an emphasis on business model innovation generated a higher performance in profit margin.

 

English went on:



… By understanding revenue, enterprise and industry model innovation, an organisation is able to make strategic changes to its business model to increase flexibility, reduce cost and open up new markets.

 

The message is clear that the business model is a key area for innovation in the way organisations shape their businesses and deploy their capabilities. The business model presents strong opportunity for growth, but also provides some challenges regarding collaboration, governance and people processes and technology. …

 

Langdon Morris, a Senior Practice Scholar at the Ackoff Center for the Advancement of Systems Approaches at the University of Pennsylvania, had this observation in his 2003 paper Business Model Warfare (link here)

 

… As we examine industry after industry, we see that wherever there is an exemplar, a company that stands head and shoulders above the others, that company is almost always a business model innovator that is applying creativity in dimensions other than technology to become a market leader. …

 

… what’s happening continuously in the marketplace is competition between business models themselves. … What this means is the winners at business model warfare have generally applied innovation to create competitive advantages, building stronger relationships with customers by developing business models that fit closely with customer needs and preferences. …



The “war Room” – When Innovation Intersects Strategy

May 16th, 2009
Damian D. Skipper Pitts asked:


There are three ways to react to an organizational crisis. One way is to turn your head to ignore the situation and hope that it will fix itself (best of luck!). Another way is to run around in a panic-induced cost-cutting frenzy that could seriously impair the organization’s long-term growth potential and future state. The third and, of course, smartest method is to recognize the impending threat to both your top and bottom line, and quickly adapt the organization’s strategic outlook and business model to the new environmental conditions. So, the question to answer is this: “what are the decision makers within your organization currently doing? Are they connecting the organization’s strategy with its innovative approach to meet a successful Future Picture?” But what if you, as the leader, are having a difficult struggle to influence others to your point of view and get them to rethinking and reinventing the organization’s strategy forward as circumstances and economics rapidly change. If you are experiencing this challenge, here’s some advice to help your people to win the battlefield of transition.

 

I have continued to state enthusiastically over the last few years that, in a world where the pace of change has gone hypercritical, today’s most important race is the race for transformational leadership and organizational renewal. It is the race to change as fast as the environment is changing around you; the race to influence positive organizational behaviors and the race to reinvent your strategy and your business model before they become obsolete. When the economy is in a state in flux, most organizations tend to postpone their professional development efforts and favor cost cutting as the strategy that will preserve the future. This is a grave mistake that will affect the future of the organization in ways that will likely kill the very spirit the leadership teams are hoping to preserve. Their efforts during the challenging times will only prolong the inevitable; ultimate demise once the current crisis is diminished. The lesson here is this; a successful business model will break almost overnight when the waves of the ocean start crashing against the pillars of the pier if leadership does not remain on a continuous, yet discontinuous approach to train the organization’s greatest asset – the people.

 

So what exactly is Strategic Organizational Renewal (SOR)? Organizations undergo change to enhance their productivity. Changes can be effected in several areas of the organization including culture, strategy, mission, teams and organizational structure. SOR is a framework that defines the role, responsibilities, and performance of human capital across the organization and the planning for it must only take place in the organizations “war room.”  To explain the war room concept, leadership appoints a specific room that will be specified as the location where the organizations strategy is planned. This location must remain under lock and key to ensure the organization’s intellectual capital offers an uncompromised agenda that influences positive outcomes. SOR is the resulting effect that is birthed from the war room. This is only possible when those appointed to the war room each understands the importance of establishing the organization’s “Memorandum of Understanding” (MOU) – the principles to achieve professional mastery.  

 

Establishing Principles to Achieve Personal Mastery – People First, then the Organization

 

You now have before you the opportunity to take the steps that achieve a high level of professional mastery that achieves organizational growth. It requires the adoption of a “code” as a living, breathing organism to each level of the organization. How can people build awareness, use their experiences to implement a new approach to deportment and develop a strategy, which includes resolve and ethical conduct? This is the task that lies before them.

 

It sounds like the normal work that we all know and do so well. But be cautioned, it is not! When individuals combine the code with rules and regulations, reporting and accountability to force conformity to standards, they will fail – to oppose change by way of fear is not what is required. Rather, achieving professional mastery is a continuous pursuit of ethical behavior that ultimately manifests into a quest of improving the human spirit; to pursue good, to do the right thing in across the workplace. The code says that who ever should adopt it into his/her life, will possess a level of courage – both physically and emotionally – to execute the necessary task that drives performance to exemplify the highest level of personal and professional conviction.

 

Why establish a code to live by? The answer is simple; establishing a code or set of principles ensures a level of conduct (code of conduct) that extends the life cycle of the organization. This code of conduct is what I have been referencing – the “Memorandum of Understanding.” As a code of conduct, the MOU provides a resource to assist people in their personal development, growth, guidance, and assessment in the leadership of self. The MOU establishes a strict perspective for instructing successful practices, theories, and beliefs that drives people to achieve a successful future (how you intend to conduct yourself into the future for others to emulate).

 

The Memorandum of Understanding is also designed for people to learn broadly; to inspire the service out of generosity for others; and to prepare them to lead systems courageously into the future. A MOU must encourage a perspective to become firmly grounded in the potential for successful growth using the following constructs:

 

§         The Cardinal Rules

 

§         The Guiding Precepts

 

§         The Forms of Disposition 

 

§         The General Orders

 

§         The Strategy Forward – Establishing Professional Mastery

 

§         The Centers of Gravity

 

The Cardinal Rules. The Cardinal Rules are a set of guidelines that are invaluable for people and organizations to follow while planning and executing at the strategic or tactical level. These rules, once established by the individual(s) or teams are the rules that govern forward movement and must not change. 

 

The Guiding Precepts. The Guiding Precepts are designed to inform people what they should and should not be doing in accordance with executing a well designed strategy to win. They also inform of the reasons “why” an action must occur and the repercussions should the individual and/or organization fail at meeting such a task.

 

The Forms of Disposition. The Forms of Disposition offer a substantive transformation in “thought” about how people achieve a perspective on things in life. It refers to an orchestrated, systemic and revolutionary new world-view resulting in a “change” of societies, cultures, and marketplaces due to behavioral perspective. This is today often called “systems theory,” which sees a web of relationships coalescing to become something greater than the parts. Individuals must be able to look at things from a perspective that they are always changing and evolving into new forms – thinking “out-of-the-box!” We are doomed to a slow death unless radical change occurs in the way we think. Change your way of thinking or die a slow death.  

 

The General Orders. The General Orders are broad, community-wide “need statements,” designed to encompass a variety of related issues in a person’s life or within the life cycle of an organization. These related issues are referred to as “Guiding Objectives,” which are specific items that need to be addressed. The Guiding Strategies (developed to fit current and future circumstance) are the methods identified for addressing the Guiding Objectives, and the Guiding Policies are the specific action steps that are recommended to implement the Guiding Strategies. The General Orders, all eleven of them, offer the ability to explore implications in an open and reflective manner and reinforce each other in providing a coherency and wholeness often lacking in life cycles.

 

The Strategy Forward – Establishing Professional Mastery. The traditional values are the foundation of the modern day; that was yesterday. Tomorrow, you have an opportunity to create commitment and the needed momentum to establish, publish, share, and teach a different set of life’s code, values, and ethics to journey into the future. After much hard work, you are prepared to develop a strategy to move forward and plan the next steps to target critical successes for winning the Future Picture. What a legacy you will leave when executed with personal and professional bearing for others to follow. This is the way of the future. This is a new chapter!  

 

The Centers of Gravity. Just as time changes, so does the internal and external influence in your life and in the life cycle of an organization. The Centers of Gravity are the dynamics within a process that offer the greatest impact on the overall system when change happens. They offer a high level of “value” and return on your energy “investment.” When combined with the concept of parallel deposits (creating energy from various perspectives in a short period of time), the Centers of Gravity make possible the seemingly impossible task of realizing success in changing paradigms. The Centers of Gravity places significant influence on the five established epicenters of any changing system to receive desired effects: Leadership, Processes, Infrastructure, Population, and Action Units.     

 

In summary, I see the Memorandum of Understanding (once established for the organization), as an opportunity to free up the actions of people as servants, but develop them as encouraged opportunists. It is empowering, it is enabling, and it grounds people in a public way on the fundamentals that they all must share to benefit the organization. There is no ethical malaise. It is important to realize that the new is not a finding from what has been lost. Rather, it is like the journey of the scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz in search of a brain (brain power in this context), the tin man in search of a heart, and the lion in search of courage. People’s value system is intact and in most cases, has been during the journey of personal growth. The MOU simply articulates and reaffirms the core value and behavioral perspective that already underlie their personal and professional appearance and conduct to achieve significant growth. And, all of this is stimulated from the affects of the war room; hence, the influences that lead to significant strategic organizational renewal in the end.

 

The Memorandum of Understanding is designed to help an organization answer four fundamental questions in order to develop and execute an effective strategy forward plan. These questions are:

 

§         Where does the organization want to be in the future?

 

§         What will the organization apply its resources against to achieve the Future Picture?

 

§         How will the organization apply those resources?

 

§         When and under what conditions will the organization exit from their current strategic plan?

 

It’s the act of dynamically adjusting business models and strategies to the deep changes at work in the external environment. Above all else, this requires innovation and the Memorandum of Understanding definitely offers an innovative perspective to most organizations. In a 2003 article in Harvard Business Review entitled “The Quest for Resilience,” Gary Hamel wrote, “Strategic renewal is creative reconstruction.” It’s all about dissecting the traditional business model and examining it for imaginative ways to reconstruct it to create significant intellectual and emotional thought space for value creation to positively influence the internal and external customers of the organization. This becomes all the more urgent in challenging times, when customer needs and market conditions swiftly and dramatically change.

 

As in the case of the New Covenant Church of Philadelphia organization, where the senior pastor and Chief Executive Officer Bishop C. Milton Grannum, set aside a specific room on the same floor of the building as his office for directing the organization’s strategic organizational renewal efforts. The organization’s new “war room” had the same critical importance as Winston Churchill’s cabinet war room in London, used to direct military strategy during World War II. Bishop Grannum’s Innovation War Room was a simple, but highly effective device that guided the New Covenant Church of Philadelphia’s appointed leadership team to focus on establishing the strategy forward to reinvent the business model and find bold, new growth opportunities. And, its impact on the organization’s strategies – and, ultimately, its performance – is still being felt today.

 

Late in the month of November 2008, even in the face of formidable pressures and economic challenges, New Covenant Church of Philadelphia braved the climate and made the decision to bring in yet another trainer, speaker and author Dr. David Ireland from the region only to learn that they were on the right path to extend the organization’s life cycle. The New Covenant Church of Philadelphia continues to be one of the most progressive thinking faith-based organizations in the region. The reason; the CEO fully understands that the time to input integrated talent management to boost the organization’s human capital is when most organizations are calling on “cost cutting” as its strategy in the face of adverse conditions.   

 

Very few organizations, for-profit and not-for-profit, can claim to have a specific innovation war room somewhere on location. But, what every organization can and should do – right now! – is organize a serious, high-level strategy forum (at least call it the “Innovation War Room” where innovation intersects strategy) to begin exercising transformative thinking and rethinking their business from the customer backward. One of the fundamental questions the leadership team must ask is this: “how do we get the people to buy-into the organization’s new perspective of transformational thinking to experience upward movement in a market where people no longer have financial resources?” And, in a nutshell, it is my perspective that in answering the question, these people should take a look at the slogan of Royal Bank of Scotland: “Less Talk!” “Start engaging the necessary requirements to strategically execute flawlessly to influence the organizations Future Picture.” Innovation powers us out of everything and must be taken seriously as a strategy that wins.

 

The absolute worst thing any organization can do during the greatest of challenging times is to assume they can go on with “business as usual – and to go along with the status quo.” Instead, they must conduct themselves as great leaders do and get busy working to understand how organizational clients’ (internal and external) priorities may have changed and quickly realign the organizational business model to address their new needs. Reading through a past edition of the Wall Street Journal, most of the advertisements (for luxury watches, exorbitant real estate, and fabulous vacation resorts) looked embarrassingly inappropriate in view of the ongoing national economic crisis that the United States of America has been facing in the past few years and the next years to come.  

 

One ad, from NOKIA, stood out in contrast. The headline: “Can anyone provide cost cutting solutions that work now? My answer is YES. Now, there’s an organization that seems to get it. But wait a minute. Didn’t that headline sound more than a little like Barack Obama? NOKIA seems to have understood the lesson from the past month’s U.S. election between President Elect Barack Obama and Senator John McCain: Whether you’re overcoming organizational politics or training people to remain on top in their careers, the winners will be those who recognize that the game has changed, and that “same old stuff” just does not cut it any longer. The world’s processes have changed in ways that the world looks much different than it did a year ago (unemployment is up 47% from 2007 – 2008, home ownership is down 26% and the statistics continue to get grim). The way to make effective decisions require innovative thought and those who miss the opportunity to change will be left behind. The best quote that I teach from fits great here: “If people seek to achieve what they have never had, they MUST be prepared to do what they have never done.”  

 

As a U.S. Marine turned business professional, responsible for leading a dynamic team of specialist into the lion’s belly when the team engages a client who is seeking to overcome business and process challenges, innovation takes precedent as our strategic starting point. Our team defines the importance of the war room, helps to identify its location and then the work begins – in the newly organized Innovation War Room. Without this component added to the mix, there’s no need to start because without it, the potential for failure rises incredibly. As we establish these critical strategy rooms, we teach companies to unpack their business model into five Centers of Gravity: Leadership, Infrastructure, Processes, Populations and Action Units. These five are used to influence positive organizational behavior from the leadership who is responsible for making the decisions to drive momentum: who they serve, what service they provide how they provide it, how they generate revenue and how they differentiate and sustain a strategic advantage.

 

Then we demonstrate how the Centers of Gravity are used to radically rethink each component using the “Six Lenses of Innovation” – the cutting-edge military-style ideation and methodology, “Battleplan for Preemptive Strike,” outlined in my latest book “Business WARFIGHTING For GREAT Teams.” So, we get the strategy teams to (1) Establish Achievable Aims; challenge deeply-held orthodoxies about who their customers are, how they interact with them, how they define their products or services, how they configure the value chain, and so on; (2) Identify Means; harness emergent trends and discontinuities to substantially change the way things are done in their industry; (3) Ensure Intelligence; leverage core competencies and strategic assets in novel ways to generate new growth; (4) Enforce Security; understand and address deep customer needs that are currently going unmet; (5) Engage the Strike; a deliberate Battleplan used by a strategic and numerically inferior power to head off a situation in which ultimate defeat would be inevitable; and lastly, (6) Flawlessly Execute the Exit Strategy; just as everything has a beginning, all things have an end. Leaders are instructed how-to establish exit points using 32 solution-centric precepts to face fierce challenges in short time frames using the process.

 

We believe that as organizations begin to reshape their cultures; it’s not hard to recognize how the principles found within the military-style ideation and methodology of the Battleplan for Preemptive Strike apply to the many burning platforms organizations are facing today. Isn’t it time you subjected your own business model to some “creative reconstruction,” aimed at making it better suited to today’s shifting customer needs and new economic realities?



A Simple Innovation Process

May 14th, 2009
Steve Gillman asked:


If you want what may be the simplest innovation process, here it is: Find the things that others are not doing well, or just not doing. Once you identify these deficiencies, design a better service or product based on what customers really want. Then sell it.

For example, there was an article in Forbes magazine recently on a Japanese company called Kumon that teaches kids around the world how to read and write and do basic math. They have over a thousand centers in the United States alone, with 194,000 students. They do almost no advertising, yet keep growing rapidly.

Now, you might wonder why with universal public education in the U.S. a Japanese company can do so well teaching the basics. The answer is simple enough: The public schools don’t do it very well in many places. Blame it on modern educational theories, “feel good” grading, distracted children or whatever, but the public system doesn’t do as good a job as parents would like. Many of them are willing to pay the relatively small amount it takes to get their kids educated properly (Kumon charges less than $120 per two-month course).

Some just want their kids to get further ahead. The federal No Child Left Behind Act pushes schools to spend resources on low-scoring students, so potential high achievers don’t get as much help as they might. Kumon teaches math without calculators, phonetic reading, and essentially stresses rote learning of the basics. Whatever they are doing, it seems to work.

Innovation Potential - Where To Look

Of course government services are a great place to look for deficiencies that could suggest innovative new businesses. For example, employment services are not particularly good at getting people back to work, and unemployment systems are often abused. Perhaps there is a need for a subscription-based employment company. Customers pay a monthly fee while working, and if they lose their jobs they’re provided either a new job or an unemployment check.

Government services sometimes do no more than provide information and then require the unemployed worker to press a button on the phone to indicate that he or she did in fact look for work that week. A private service would have the incentive to find the person a job if the company otherwise had to continue paying out unemployment. They would also require that the worker take a job that is offered, or lose their benefits. I’ll bet that would cut unemployment in half in some areas.

Many people have tried to deliver mail in busy cities, sometimes by bicycle. They have usually done so much more efficiently than the post office (until they were unfortunately shut down by the government). You can apply this basic innovation process in many areas of government services.

Look at private businesses too. There are often services that are deficient or incomplete not only in a given company or two, but in whole industries. For example, I recently installed a blog on one of my websites. Actually my wife did the installation. It would have taken me five days, but it took her only five hours. But this was software that promised “easy five minute installation,” and was perhaps the easiest in the industry - even at five hours. Now, I **** spending time on supposedly “easy” things like that. If someone actually made an easy one, that’s an innovation that I would have paid for.

One way to start this innovation process then, is to start listening for complaints. If you hear the same complaint about a product or service over and over, there’s a market for something better. You can begin with your own complaints and frustrations and see if they are shared by others. For example, I **** a slow computer, and many other people do as well. There are already “computer doctors” out there, but maybe the innovation here would be a service that specializes in making your computer as fast as it can be. I just paid $50 for that to a traditional computer doctor, but I would have called the specialist if there was one (and it could have been him, as it turns out).

Also look for products and services (or combinations of these) that are not complete. We went to the vet with our cat recently, and he did a great job, but I had questions later, and knew I would only get the receptionist if I called. It would have been nice if he had a website where we could get information and email questions to him. The time he spent on answering questions would almost certainly generate more business for him (he could remind us to get that last round of shots we’ve been putting off). Maybe the innovation here would be a company that sets up such websites for all of the thousands of vets around the country.

Look for deficiencies. Look for “incomplete” services and products. Then design something better and make it happen. That’s a simple but effective innovation process.



Innovation and Porter’s Five Forces Theory

May 6th, 2009
Olivia Hunt asked:


Innovation is the process of making advances by inventing something new. It is the introduction of a new idea, method or device. In other words, innovation is a change that improves an already existing product or idea. Besides, successful usage of new ideas can be called an innovation. A company cannot exist and develop without innovation technologies in the modern competitive world. It must innovate in order to survive. Innovation is the major factor of company’s success and growth. Innovation ‘is generally understood as the introduction of a new thing or method. Innovation is the embodiment, combination, or synthesis of knowledge in original, relevant, valued new products, processes, or services’ (Luecke and Katz 2003, p. 2). Innovation includes technical innovation (products and services) and social innovation (organizations and markets). The most successful innovation strategies are made up of both elements.

Innovation goes along with creative though these are two different notions. Innovation means action on the basis of creative ideas. All innovation begins with creative ideas. We define innovation as the successful implementation of creative ideas within an organization. In this view, creativity by individuals and teams is a starting point for innovation; the first is necessary but not sufficient condition for the second. Several years ago the innovation became an urgent necessity for companies. Since that time most companies focus their attention on this issue. In a modern world companies must continue the innovative process for keeping the brand popularity and meeting the customers’ needs via strategic planning and development of products.

A successful company should manage its brand effectiveness and popularity via developing the innovative strategies. Innovation connects the possibilities of a company with unmet customers’ needs. A company must strategically plan in what way to keep and enlarge brand effectiveness. Product and service innovation are used for achieving the result. For instance, the Apple Corporation has an effective brand popular as a customer-focused corporation. Every company provides some kind of services. These services must be improved via innovation strategies to make the client come back again and again. Innovation is the mainspring of the company’s growth and prosperity. It consists of product, service and brand innovation.